Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Buck, I think that's an overly pessimistic view. It's only my generation (baby boomers) that even lived in an age when all art, popular or high, could be recorded and stored forever. Prior to my time, I could never have learned to love Jimmie Rodgers, Hank Williams and Bob Wills, because the melding of cultures and the ability to reproduce art just weren't there. Music is music. Most of it sucks (most everything sucks), but I believe what people loved in the '60s will be loved generations from now -- because it was worthy of inspiring love.Because we have willingly, as a society, refused to acknowledge a difference between art and entertainment, between high culture and popular culture.
Every entertainer is now an artist. Every person pursuing any form of creative endeavor is now an artist.
That is why the overwhelming majority of what is currently considered art will not endure.
The vast majority of art through the ages does not endure, and popular entertainment is even less enduring.
Buck, I think that's an overly pessimistic view. It's only my generation (baby boomers) that even lived in an age when all art, popular or high, could be recorded and stored forever. Prior to my time, I could never have learned to love Jimmie Rodgers, Hank Williams and Bob Wills, because the melding of cultures and the ability to reproduce art just weren't there. Music is music. Most of it sucks (most everything sucks), but I believe what people loved in the '60s will be loved generations from now -- because it was worthy of inspiring love.
I'm really skirting what could be considered young (33), but weighing in here anyway. My stranded-on-a-desert-island top 25 from the 2010s is as follows:
1) Lisbon- The Walkmen
2) Good Kid, M.A.A.D City- Kendrick Lamar
3) My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy- Kanye West
4) Halcyon Digest- Deerhunter
5) Modern Vampires of the City- Vampire Weekend
6) To Pimp a Butterfly- Kendrick Lamar
7) This Is Happening- LCD Soundsystem
8) Kaputt- Destroyer
9) Reflektor- Arcade Fire
10) Art Angels- Grimes
11) Currents- Tame Impala
12) Teens of Denial- Car Seat Headrest
13) St. Vincent- St. Vincent
14) Channel Orange- Frank Ocean
15) Yeezus- Kanye West
16) Lonerism- Tame Impala
17) Take Care- Drake
18) No Cities to Love- Sleater-Kinney
19) Days Are Gone- HAIM
20) Summertime '06- Vince Staples
21) Teen Dream- Beach House
22) Human Performance- Parquet Courts
23) In Colour- Jamie XX
24) Bloom- Beach House
25) Parallax- Atlas Sound
Honorable mention: Any of Kurt Vile's. They're all very good.
I have to respectfully disagree, Mike.
I do not think a lot of the popular music of the 1960s will continue to endure with the same respect and admiration it enjoys now.
I am a 46-year-old Gen Xer, and the music of the 1960s is already less important to the current and rising generations than it was to my generation.
I am old enough to have grown up among a lot of adults who loved the music of the 1950s and believed it would always endure. It is now largely ignored.
The popular music of the 1940s and 1930s is completely ignored.
The music of the 1950s and 1960s was widely recorded and widely available, yet it continues to decline in importance among rising generations.
There is nothing wrong with that. It is the way of the world, the way of civilization and the way of history.
What I think it points out, is the continuing difference between popular culture and high culture, more specifically the difference between art and entertainment.
Respect and admiration for creative work over time is a quality of art.
I love the music of the 1960s, 70s, 80s and 90s. I love a lot of music today.
However, I do not think that three generations from now - 60 years - that music will be anything more than a quaint novelty.
I do not think a lot of the popular music of the 1960s will continue to endure with the same respect and admiration it enjoys now.
I'm really skirting what could be considered young (33), but weighing in here anyway. My stranded-on-a-desert-island top 25 from the 2010s is as follows.
I have to respectfully disagree, Mike.
I do not think a lot of the popular music of the 1960s will continue to endure with the same respect and admiration it enjoys now.
I am a 46-year-old Gen Xer, and the music of the 1960s is already less important to the current and rising generations than it was to my generation.
I am old enough to have grown up among a lot of adults who loved the music of the 1950s and believed it would always endure. It is now largely ignored.
The popular music of the 1940s and 1930s is completely ignored.
The music of the 1950s and 1960s was widely recorded and widely available, yet it continues to decline in importance among rising generations.
There is nothing wrong with that. It is the way of the world, the way of civilization and the way of history.
What I think it points out, is the continuing difference between popular culture and high culture, more specifically the difference between art and entertainment.
Respect and admiration for creative work over time is a quality of art.
I love the music of the 1960s, 70s, 80s and 90s. I love a lot of music today.
However, I do not think that three generations from now - 60 years - that music will be anything more than a quaint novelty.
Looked at the list and recognized zero songs and only 3 artists.