H.L. Mencken
Member
Chris Davis just might make a run at the American Leagur HR record. Who holds it?
Some guy named Maris. Still.
Some guy named Maris. Still.
Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
deskslave said:That's one way of making a race to 60 seem more interesting.
People talk a lot about unbreakable records -- DiMaggio, Ripken, etc. Is Bonds' 73 unbreakable, given how it happened? Or is it really just a slightly more juiced ball or giant leap in bat technology (or new bandbox ballpark) away?
HanSenSE said:deskslave said:That's one way of making a race to 60 seem more interesting.
People talk a lot about unbreakable records -- DiMaggio, Ripken, etc. Is Bonds' 73 unbreakable, given how it happened? Or is it really just a slightly more juiced ball or giant leap in bat technology (or new bandbox ballpark) away?
I wonder if, like in track and field, improved conventional training methods might bring down that mark eventually. As stunning as Ben Johnson's 9.79 100 time in Seoul was, it's being attained some 25 years later. Or even Bob Beamon in Mexico City
KYSportsWriter said:I'm probably the only one here who feels this way, but it's time for MLB to retire the Stars and Stripes caps.
deskslave said:That's one way of making a race to 60 seem more interesting.
People talk a lot about unbreakable records -- DiMaggio, Ripken, etc. Is Bonds' 73 unbreakable, given how it happened? Or is it really just a slightly more juiced ball or giant leap in bat technology (or new bandbox ballpark) away?
deskslave said:HanSenSE said:deskslave said:That's one way of making a race to 60 seem more interesting.
People talk a lot about unbreakable records -- DiMaggio, Ripken, etc. Is Bonds' 73 unbreakable, given how it happened? Or is it really just a slightly more juiced ball or giant leap in bat technology (or new bandbox ballpark) away?
I wonder if, like in track and field, improved conventional training methods might bring down that mark eventually. As stunning as Ben Johnson's 9.79 100 time in Seoul was, it's being attained some 25 years later. Or even Bob Beamon in Mexico City
But then in T&F, the only true opponent is the clock, or the bar, or whatever. Theoretically, if hitters are advancing in leaps and bounds, then so should pitchers.
deskslave said:But then in T&F, the only true opponent is the clock, or the bar, or whatever. Theoretically, if hitters are advancing in leaps and bounds, then so should pitchers.
KYSportsWriter said:I'm probably the only one here who feels this way, but it's time for MLB to retire the Stars and Stripes caps.
Armchair_QB said:deskslave said:HanSenSE said:deskslave said:That's one way of making a race to 60 seem more interesting.
People talk a lot about unbreakable records -- DiMaggio, Ripken, etc. Is Bonds' 73 unbreakable, given how it happened? Or is it really just a slightly more juiced ball or giant leap in bat technology (or new bandbox ballpark) away?
I wonder if, like in track and field, improved conventional training methods might bring down that mark eventually. As stunning as Ben Johnson's 9.79 100 time in Seoul was, it's being attained some 25 years later. Or even Bob Beamon in Mexico City
But then in T&F, the only true opponent is the clock, or the bar, or whatever. Theoretically, if hitters are advancing in leaps and bounds, then so should pitchers.
Does make you wonder what Maris and Mantle were on during their chase in 61.