• Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

2013 MLB Regular Season running thread

That's one way of making a race to 60 seem more interesting.

People talk a lot about unbreakable records -- DiMaggio, Ripken, etc. Is Bonds' 73 unbreakable, given how it happened? Or is it really just a slightly more juiced ball or giant leap in bat technology (or new bandbox ballpark) away?
 
deskslave said:
That's one way of making a race to 60 seem more interesting.

People talk a lot about unbreakable records -- DiMaggio, Ripken, etc. Is Bonds' 73 unbreakable, given how it happened? Or is it really just a slightly more juiced ball or giant leap in bat technology (or new bandbox ballpark) away?

I wonder if, like in track and field, improved conventional training methods might bring down that mark eventually. As stunning as Ben Johnson's 9.79 100 time in Seoul was, it's being attained some 25 years later. Or even Bob Beamon in Mexico City
 
HanSenSE said:
deskslave said:
That's one way of making a race to 60 seem more interesting.

People talk a lot about unbreakable records -- DiMaggio, Ripken, etc. Is Bonds' 73 unbreakable, given how it happened? Or is it really just a slightly more juiced ball or giant leap in bat technology (or new bandbox ballpark) away?

I wonder if, like in track and field, improved conventional training methods might bring down that mark eventually. As stunning as Ben Johnson's 9.79 100 time in Seoul was, it's being attained some 25 years later. Or even Bob Beamon in Mexico City

But then in T&F, the only true opponent is the clock, or the bar, or whatever. Theoretically, if hitters are advancing in leaps and bounds, then so should pitchers.
 
Reds and Giants were supposed to start half an hour ago. Raining cats and dogs. But Reds don't want to give up the big 4th of July gate, so they aren't even thinking of canceling. The 1 p.m. local start is now "most likely will not begin until very late this afternoon or early this evening," according to Enquirer's Twitter feed.
 
deskslave said:
That's one way of making a race to 60 seem more interesting.

People talk a lot about unbreakable records -- DiMaggio, Ripken, etc. Is Bonds' 73 unbreakable, given how it happened? Or is it really just a slightly more juiced ball or giant leap in bat technology (or new bandbox ballpark) away?

What about also a slightly (read: heavily) more juiced Barry Bonds?
 
deskslave said:
HanSenSE said:
deskslave said:
That's one way of making a race to 60 seem more interesting.

People talk a lot about unbreakable records -- DiMaggio, Ripken, etc. Is Bonds' 73 unbreakable, given how it happened? Or is it really just a slightly more juiced ball or giant leap in bat technology (or new bandbox ballpark) away?

I wonder if, like in track and field, improved conventional training methods might bring down that mark eventually. As stunning as Ben Johnson's 9.79 100 time in Seoul was, it's being attained some 25 years later. Or even Bob Beamon in Mexico City

But then in T&F, the only true opponent is the clock, or the bar, or whatever. Theoretically, if hitters are advancing in leaps and bounds, then so should pitchers.

Does make you wonder what Maris and Mantle were on during their chase in 61.
 
deskslave said:
But then in T&F, the only true opponent is the clock, or the bar, or whatever. Theoretically, if hitters are advancing in leaps and bounds, then so should pitchers.

I don't see any reason why they should be advancing at the same rate.
 
KYSportsWriter said:
I'm probably the only one here who feels this way, but it's time for MLB to retire the Stars and Stripes caps.

And the camouflage caps, and third, fourth, fifth, sixth and beyond jerseys (I'm talking to you, Brewers).
 
Armchair_QB said:
deskslave said:
HanSenSE said:
deskslave said:
That's one way of making a race to 60 seem more interesting.

People talk a lot about unbreakable records -- DiMaggio, Ripken, etc. Is Bonds' 73 unbreakable, given how it happened? Or is it really just a slightly more juiced ball or giant leap in bat technology (or new bandbox ballpark) away?

I wonder if, like in track and field, improved conventional training methods might bring down that mark eventually. As stunning as Ben Johnson's 9.79 100 time in Seoul was, it's being attained some 25 years later. Or even Bob Beamon in Mexico City

But then in T&F, the only true opponent is the clock, or the bar, or whatever. Theoretically, if hitters are advancing in leaps and bounds, then so should pitchers.

Does make you wonder what Maris and Mantle were on during their chase in 61.

In Mantle's case, I have a pretty good idea.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top