• Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Judge strikes down most of Walker's anti-union law

  • Thread starter Thread starter Uncle.Ruckus
  • Start date Start date
dixiehack said:
Question for Sconny SportsJournalists.com: Could the Republicans field a primary candidate to challenge Walker in the recall, however unlikely?
There's not need to. The only reason to have a primary is to make the election later and the fact that there's going to be a primary (May 8) among the no-chance democrats makes it so the election already will happen on June 5.

Walker is by far the most popular of anyone who would run among Republicans. He'll win the election (and the crybaby class will turn their crybabying up even more). Besides, it's a recall election. He's the one they're trying to recall, not someone else.
 
old_tony said:
dixiehack said:
Question for Sconny SportsJournalists.com: Could the Republicans field a primary candidate to challenge Walker in the recall, however unlikely?
There's not need to. The only reason to have a primary is to make the election later and the fact that there's going to be a primary (May 8) among the no-chance democrats makes it so the election already will happen on June 5.

Walker is by far the most popular of anyone who would run among Republicans. He'll win the election (and the crybaby class will turn their crybabying up even more). Besides, it's a recall election. He's the one they're trying to recall, not someone else.

You do realize a Republican beat the incumbent Republican Senate President in Arizona last fall in a recall election.
 
Stitch said:
old_tony said:
dixiehack said:
Question for Sconny SportsJournalists.com: Could the Republicans field a primary candidate to challenge Walker in the recall, however unlikely?
There's not need to. The only reason to have a primary is to make the election later and the fact that there's going to be a primary (May 8) among the no-chance democrats makes it so the election already will happen on June 5.

Walker is by far the most popular of anyone who would run among Republicans. He'll win the election (and the crybaby class will turn their crybabying up even more). Besides, it's a recall election. He's the one they're trying to recall, not someone else.

You do realize a Republican beat the incumbent Republican Senate President in Arizona last fall in a recall election.
It ain't happening here. Trust me. The beauty of it all, too, is the whining party's candidates will have to drain their campaign accounts in the primary while Walker won't.

And since there will be a Dem primary in all the races and there won't be a Republican primary in any of the races (and Wisconsin has open primaries), Republican voters can vote in those primaries. There's a pretty large movement to write in Walker in the Democrat primary. With four Dems running and splitting the vote, it would be a real hoot if Walker could win the Dem primary.
 
It's hilarious how they want to be called "Democratic" when they have no respect for election results, election integrity or the Constitution.
 
old_tony said:
It's hilarious how they want to be called "Democratic" when they have no respect for election results, election integrity or the Constitution.

Anyone miss Carlton?
 
dixiehack said:
Question for Sconny SportsJournalists.com: Could the Republicans field a primary candidate to challenge Walker in the recall, however unlikely?

They might have to if Walker's indicted soon.

http://www.jsonline.com/blogs/news/138672934.html
 
ifilus said:
dixiehack said:
Question for Sconny SportsJournalists.com: Could the Republicans field a primary candidate to challenge Walker in the recall, however unlikely?

They might have to if Walker's indicted soon.

http://www.jsonline.com/blogs/news/138672934.html
A two-month-old blog. Not gonna happen.
 
old_tony said:
ifilus said:
dixiehack said:
Question for Sconny SportsJournalists.com: Could the Republicans field a primary candidate to challenge Walker in the recall, however unlikely?

They might have to if Walker's indicted soon.

http://www.jsonline.com/blogs/news/138672934.html
A two-month-old blog. Not gonna happen.


Yeah. He's not worried.

Gov. Scott Walker announced Friday that he has set up a legal- defense fund to help pay expenses incurred as a result of the John Doe investigation of activities during his time as county executive...

"If you create a legal-defense fund, you are either being investigated, being charged with or have been convicted of a criminal violation of Chapter 11 or Chapter 12," said retired state election lawyer George Dunst, referring to the statutes dealing with campaign finance and election fraud.

http://www.jsonline.com/watchdog/noquarter/walker-sets-up-legaldefense-fund-f64gqrb-142164553.html
 
Stitch said:
old_tony said:
It's hilarious how they want to be called "Democratic" when they have no respect for election results, election integrity or the Constitution.

Anyone miss Carlton?

This thread would have already been locked if he was around.
 
old_tony said:
It's hilarious how they want to be called "Democratic" when they have no respect for election results, election integrity or the Constitution.

Translation: OT knows his own arguments aren't strong enough, so he has to demonize the party he disagrees with.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top