Judge strikes down most of Walker's anti-union law

[Cubbiebum]

It's hilarious how they want to be called "Democratic" when they have no respect for election results, election integrity or the Constitution.

You sound like a very mature 8-year old and by that I mean you sound like a punk teenager.

I'm a moderate who votes for both party's for the record. I just can't stand morons who insult, trash and what have you people of the other party. It fuels everything that is wrong with our politicians.

 

[Point of Order]

It's hilarious how they want to be called "Democratic" when they have no respect for election results, election integrity or the Constitution.

Walker disrespected the Constitution with his free-speech-violating union-busting law.

 

[Beaker]

It's hilarious how they want to be called "Democratic" when they have no respect for election results, election integrity or the Constitution.

You sound like a very mature 8-year old and by that I mean you sound like a punk teenager.

I'm a moderate who votes for both party's for the record. I just can't stand morons who insult, trash and what have you people of the other party. It fuels everything that is wrong with our politicians.

That might even be generous to him.

 

[Ben_Hecht]

It's hilarious how they want to be called "Democratic" when they have no respect for election results, election integrity or the Constitution.

Walker disrespected the Constitution with his free-speech-violating union-busting law.

. . . not to mention that the Koch-smoker wholly-misrepresented himself during his campaign. The broad population was sent into shock when Douchebag went into useful-idiot-messenger-tool mode after the election, doing his masters' bidding. Disingenous little shirt. Love to see the brick sweat. They won't be able to steal enough votes to save him in the rerun. Pols who keep their true intentions in check until the race is declared official can't suffer enough public indignity.

 

[YGBFKM]

It's hilarious how they want to be called "Democratic" when they have no respect for election results, election integrity or the Constitution.

You sound like a very mature 8-year old and by that I mean you sound like a punk teenager.

I'm a moderate who votes for both party's for the record. I just can't stand morons who insult, trash and what have you people of the other party. It fuels everything that is wrong with our politicians.

This is awesome in its obliviousness and creative spelling and grammar.

 

[YGBFKM]

Pols who keep their true intentions in check until the race is declared official can't suffer enough public indignity.

You can't possibly type this with a straight face.

 

[Ben_Hecht]

Pols who keep their true intentions in check until the race is declared official can't suffer enough public indignity.

You can't possibly type this with a straight face.

In Walker's case? Are you kidding? He hid the shiv in the trenchcoat until he was ensconced.

You could say it about Fredo, too, now that you've brought it up . . .

 

[deskslave]

Question for Sconny SportsJournalists.com: Could the Republicans field a primary candidate to challenge Walker in the recall, however unlikely?

There's not need to. The only reason to have a primary is to make the election later and the fact that there's going to be a primary (May 8) among the no-chance democrats makes it so the election already will happen on June 5.

Walker is by far the most popular of anyone who would run among Republicans. He'll win the election (and the crybaby class will turn their crybabying up even more). Besides, it's a recall election. He's the one they're trying to recall, not someone else.

You do realize a Republican beat the incumbent Republican Senate President in Arizona last fall in a recall election.

It ain't happening here. Trust me. The beauty of it all, too, is the whining party's candidates will have to drain their campaign accounts in the primary while Walker won't.

And since there will be a Dem primary in all the races and there won't be a Republican primary in any of the races (and Wisconsin has open primaries), Republican voters can vote in those primaries. There's a pretty large movement to write in Walker in the Democrat primary. With four Dems running and splitting the vote, it would be a real hoot if Walker could win the Dem primary.

So the Democrats using a perfectly legal mechanism to recall Walker -- that whole "accountability to the electorate" thing -- is disrespecting the election process, but hijacking a primary -- probably legal, but shady, and something you would squeal like a stuck pig about if the shoe were on the other foot -- is a "hoot."

Can't think why no one takes you seriously.

 

[Ben_Hecht]

Question for Sconny SportsJournalists.com: Could the Republicans field a primary candidate to challenge Walker in the recall, however unlikely?

There's not need to. The only reason to have a primary is to make the election later and the fact that there's going to be a primary (May 8) among the no-chance democrats makes it so the election already will happen on June 5.

Walker is by far the most popular of anyone who would run among Republicans. He'll win the election (and the crybaby class will turn their crybabying up even more). Besides, it's a recall election. He's the one they're trying to recall, not someone else.

You do realize a Republican beat the incumbent Republican Senate President in Arizona last fall in a recall election.

It ain't happening here. Trust me. The beauty of it all, too, is the whining party's candidates will have to drain their campaign accounts in the primary while Walker won't.

And since there will be a Dem primary in all the races and there won't be a Republican primary in any of the races (and Wisconsin has open primaries), Republican voters can vote in those primaries. There's a pretty large movement to write in Walker in the Democrat primary. With four Dems running and splitting the vote, it would be a real hoot if Walker could win the Dem primary.

So the Democrats using a perfectly legal mechanism to recall Walker -- that whole "accountability to the electorate" thing -- is disrespecting the election process, but hijacking a primary -- probably legal, but shady, and something you would squeal like a stuck pig about if the shoe were on the other foot -- is a "hoot."

Can't think why no one takes you seriously.

That kind of thinking is what the Clown Show is looking to resort to?


It is to laugh.

 

[Armchair_QB]

Pols who keep their true intentions in check until the race is declared official can't suffer enough public indignity.

You can't possibly type this with a straight face.

In Walker's case? Are you kidding? He hid the shiv in the trenchcoat until he was ensconced.

You could say it about Fredo, too, now that you've brought it up . . .

Of course Democratics (feel better Starman?) would never resort to anything like that...

 

[Ben_Hecht]

Pols who keep their true intentions in check until the race is declared official can't suffer enough public indignity.

You can't possibly type this with a straight face.

In Walker's case? Are you kidding? He hid the shiv in the trenchcoat until he was ensconced.

You could say it about Fredo, too, now that you've brought it up . . .

Of course Democratics (feel better Starman?) would never resort to anything like that...

To the degree that the Koch-suckers are looking to send as many working people as possible back to Maggie's Farm? No.

 

[dixiehack]

All I was asking about was the pure mechanics of whether it was possible under state law.