Dick Whitman
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 1, 2009
- Messages
- 45,703
They.
Both.
Suck.
What sucks about Diet Coke?
Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
They.
Both.
Suck.
And if you care about your health you aren't imbibing too many of them.
Anyone with the intellectual curiosity to look something up on the Internet is just an idiot unworthy of Goo's time.
What sucks about Diet Coke?
Of course as is typically the case on here, I never said anything remotely close to that.
I would say that people with a little bit of knowledge from things they have read typically are ridiculously confident to an unwarranted degree about what they think they have learned. This thread, and deck's posts in particular, has been a study in itself of the Dunning-Kruger effect.
Of course as is typically the case on here, I never said anything remotely close to that.
I would say that people with a little bit of knowledge from things they have read typically are ridiculously confident to an unwarranted degree about what they think they have learned. This thread, and deck's posts in particular, has been a study in itself of the Dunning-Kruger effect.
If you really think pushing anything synthetic into your body is a good thing there's zero point to having this conversation.
You're sounding like one of those 1950s cigarette commercials that say that eight out of 10 doctors recommend Camel cigarettes to the other brands.
I think it's just missing an "and". Protection against irritation and against cough. That's how I read it anyway. (THIS IS WHY YOU NEED EDITORS, LUCKY STRIKE!)The double negative at the bottom is confusing me. Are Luckies pro-cough?
I think it's just missing an "and". Protection against irritation and against cough. That's how I read it anyway. (THIS IS WHY YOU NEED EDITORS, LUCKY STRIKE!)