• Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Super Bowl 50

Its practically a zero sum game. If there are more pashing attempts, there are less running backs who end up like Earl Campbell.
 
The point is that now there are more opportunities. Roman Gabriel led the NFL in pashing attempts in '73 with 460. That would have topped only one team this year, the Vikings with 454. The Ravens led the league with almost 200 more attempts.

Your point aside, there were also two less games in 1973.

Gabriel averaged 33 attempts per game. Add two games, and he'd have 526 attempts.

526 attempts this season would have tied the 49ers for 24th in the league.

John Reaves, his backup, threw 19 pashes that season. Even ashuming he wouldn't have played in those two additional games, and add those 19 pashes to Gabriel's pro-rated 526 and that is 545 pashes, which would have ranked them 22nd in the league.

Your point is correct in terms of the average number of pash attempts per team. In 1973, teams averaged 340 attempts in 14 games, while in 2015, they average 571 attempts in 16 games.
 
NFL Network is running a Super Bowl marathon, with games shown in their entirety.
Pats-Seahawks is on now, followed by Ravens-49ers. They're also showing Super Bowls 43, 42, 36 and 32 before it wraps up around noon tomorrow. Neat stuff.
 
As a kid I loved it when ESPN would run the NFL Films versions of the SBs in the 24 hours leading up to the game.
 
NFL Network does it now the Saturday-Sunday the week before the game. Showing these marathons is a much better idea. It's like methadone for the fans facing nothing but college basketball, figure skating and golf on the tube.
 
NFL Network does it now the Saturday-Sunday the week before the game. Showing these marathons is a much better idea. It's like methadone for the fans facing nothing but college basketball, figure skating and golf on the tube.

That's a funny analogy, since there's actually a graphic on the screen that says #FootballWithdrawal.
 
I think it would be better showing a random game from the last five years where you may not know how it finishes.
 
Anybody else watch the 1985 Bears 30 for 30 last night?

Pretty good stuff, but I can't believe they all but ignored the Super Bowl Shuffle. My understanding is that it's nigh impossible to get the rights for that, but you would think they'd have spent a few minutes discussing it. You can't tell the story of the 85 Bears without it, IMO.
I finally caught it last night. I agree; not having the Super Bowl Shuffle was a huge miss.
I really liked the Singletary with Ryan stuff. And having Ryan's letter read at the end was a cool touch.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top