• Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Worst QB decision by NFL franchise.

I didn't watch him closely enough in real time, but wasn't Lomax a little bit better than that? He had decent career numbers and his Cardinals teams were around .500. He led the league in passing yardage once (albeit the 1987 strike-shortened season) and made a couple of Pro Bowls. He also threw for 4,614 yards in 1984, which was fourth all-time at the time. Not a Hall of Famer by any means, but perhaps at the top of the late 80s second tier.

Reading up on him just now, he's another good "what if?" case. Lomax was one of the first college QBs to play in the run and shoot, which was finally making its way to the NFL right as he was forced to retire because of injuries. Makes you wonder what could have been had he stayed healthy and latched on with the early 90s Lions or Falcons that were using it.

Neil Lomax was much, much better than Tony Eason and Bobby Brister. Imagine if he had a better franchise to play for than the Cardinals.

Maybe a Hall of Very Good ... but still, much better than merely adequate and leagues ahead of the Easons and Bristers of his time.
 
Lomax was way better than Eason. IIRC he couldn't stay healthy and lost his career to the same kind of necrotic hip condition that ended Bo Jackson's career.
 
So how bad is Cleveland at QB?

Does anyone even remember the Jake Delhomme disaster?
 

Latest posts

Back
Top