sgreenwell
Well-Known Member
Eh. I think a dirty little secret of college basketball is that there is less evidence of guys "improving" year over year than you'd think. Coaches are brought in to win, not to develop players. And understandably, players want to play, and it's hard to get better if you're not playing regular minutes in games. Your average player is probably improving himself more by just getting to any program where he can play 20+ MPG, ASAP, vs. riding the pine for three years. (For the life of me, I can't remember if it was Hollinger or Kevin Pelton, but a similar trend exists in the NBA. Namely, it's better to just play a guy and see what they have, vs. ashuming they'll just improve on their own or via practices.)Yep, there is no point to getting attached to any particular player. It's truly cheering for the laundry. You might get lucky and a guy will stay a year or two. But the days of a guy lingering on the bench for two years, waiting for his shot? Those are done. Instead of developing within a program, that guy is transferring for immediate playing time.