• Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Bengals-Rams: Running Super Bowl LVI thread



I'm sharing this mostly because I'm amused when Cowherd reveals himself to be an idiot, which is quite often. Apparently, Joe Burrow has small hands and his arm isn't strong enough to make up for that issue. o_O


My favorite Cowherd take was that teams should draft quarterbacks based on attractiveness, because it made for self-confidence.

LeBatard's celebrity pickers this season, filled with people who know nothing about football, were 10 games better against the spread than Cowherd's weekly picks this season.
 
My favorite Cowherd take was that teams should draft quarterbacks based on attractiveness, because it made for self-confidence.

LeBatard's celebrity pickers this season, filled with people who know nothing about football, were 10 games better against the spread than Cowherd's weekly picks this season.
I would be in favor of a federal law that media folks, print, radio and TV, be required to bet their own money on every NFL pick they make. Sum needn't be a lot, but it can't be like five bucks, either.
 
I would be in favor of a federal law that media folks, print, radio and TV, be required to bet their own money on every NFL pick they make. Sum needn't be a lot, but it can't be like five bucks, either.

As if DraftKings and FanDuel didn't make enough money already.
 
I would be in favor of a federal law that media folks, print, radio and TV, be required to bet their own money on every NFL pick they make. Sum needn't be a lot, but it can't be like five bucks, either.
I never wanted to make picks when I was a sportswriter, but most of the newspapers I worked for made me. Always hated doing it.

One year when I was covering high schools, we had staff pics for all the area games. I tried to opt out but the SE would not allow it. So I protested by picking the home team in every game. I ended up right around .500 for the season.
 
I never wanted to make picks when I was a sportswriter, but most of the newspapers I worked for made me. Always hated doing it.

One year when I was covering high schools, we had staff pics for all the area games. I tried to opt out but the SE would not allow it. So I protested by picking the home team in every game. I ended up right around .500 for the season.
I've posted this here before, but in 1989, the Herald gave me the weekly NFL gambling column. I wound up about .500 for the year, which meant I lost money against the vig, but mostly I used it to write stuff that interested me about football and math, trying to make it funny. Before the playoffs, I was relieved from this duty with the memorable words of my editor, "We believe nothing's sacred at the Herald, but you can't make fun of gambling!"
 
I never wanted to make picks when I was a sportswriter, but most of the newspapers I worked for made me. Always hated doing it.

One year when I was covering high schools, we had staff pics for all the area games. I tried to opt out but the SE would not allow it. So I protested by picking the home team in every game. I ended up right around .500 for the season.

As a desker, even I had to make prep football picks. I picked the underdog every week.

I was having lunch at a bar down the street one day, and a table of folks were discussing the picks -- in particular my picks -- and how stupid I was. One ol' boy up and says, That swingline is a deckhead. I was sitting two tables away, laughing to myself.

One time, one of my picks came in, a big underdog winning. Our writer came back and said the coach held up our paper in the locker room and said, Only swingline believed in us!
 

Latest posts

Back
Top