Azrael
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2010
- Messages
- 28,881
Maybe because I had no idea how you came to "How good is the "decision making" of a drug-addled schizophrenic?" from what I posted.
Of course by the time he was very far gone, he wasn't capable of making good decisions.
That piece was about how he got to there. I was commenting on how he got there. ... it's never as simple as, "He was a helpless victim with no hand in his own life.
He wasn't born a drug-addled schizophrenic. I quoted that graph from the piece which says nobody would have called him severely mentally ill when he was young, but his friend thinks he went downhill after he started messing around with K2.
Who is posting, or has posted, that?
You mentioned very specifically, his "choice" to leave Harbor House.
My question, when he was given the "Alternative to Incarceration" treatment and sentenced to Harbor House with a warning to see it through and he said and did all the right things in court, but then he skipped out after less than 2 weeks. ... there is a long description of what he really needed and didn't get that seemed to absolve him. ... when what I saw as a choice he made. Was he ever responsible for anything he did, and the consequences of his own decisions?
He was far gone by then.
Which leads to the question: How good is the "decision making" of a drug-addled schizophrenic?