The Big Ragu
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2002
- Messages
- 30,281
She based all of that on. ... "However, there is zero evidence that WIV had SARS-CoV-2 or a progenitor in their collection."
But she has no more idea than you or I do (her being a virologist gives her no special knowledge about something that none of us know) about what they had in their collection BEYOND what she is personally familiar with. ... or if they were working on a Sars-CoV-2 virus that she knew nothing about, which was serial passaged in their labs into what eventually leaked (if that is how it happened).
She can just say, "As far as I know, they weren't working on a Sars-CoV-2 virus there." Which gives her as much insight as you have. She wasn't in that lab.
She acknowledges that. ... and then just moves on like it's not the main point, and goes on to tweet over and over again about work that SHE KNOWS they were doing in that lab. ... creating a deatailed argument about how it's not consistent with the virus that caused the pandemic, and trying to take people back to the things that are consistent with it having come from nature.
But nobody knows precisely what they were working on in that institute, including her. ... you can't even rely on her possibly knowing some of the scientists in that lab, because the Chinese made them disappear from the outside world in 2020.