dixiehack
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2002
- Messages
- 39,177
More than anything it likely points to how little difference there truly is in maybe the top 30 or so in schedule strength and it being better to consider it within broad ranges instead of microscopic detail.Perhaps more confounding than the Zags' high standing in KenPom overall: why Auburn is only 17th in non-conference SoS. I know that when you take every non-con opponent into consideration, you can grasp the numerical reasoning for why they're 17th. But they've played four of the non-SEC teams in the overall top 10. Hard to do more than that.
If you asked me what the difference is between them and Bama (nine places higher in noncon SOS) I would ashume it is the quality of opponent in guarantee games. Nate Oats brings in teams like South Dakota State and McNeese and Arkansas State that have a bit more meat on the bone compared to their peer schools. Auburn has a few games that leaned a little more in the cupcake direction such as Monmouth and Georgia State. Even Vermont and Richmond are down a good bit from recent history.
Again, a distinction so small as to be virtually meaningless. The Tigers faced a plenty rugged schedule before the calendar flipped.